Keynes is known for making reference to animal spirts. Today we use terms such as bull/bear, and hawk/dove. No doubt this extends the history of philosophy of likening and metaphorizing the outputs of complex functions and inputs etc. Here I am thinking of how society or humans are really subservient…

…. I can’t write this yet.

I keep losing my reference to this so im making it easy to find. (the context is that I was in debate with voskuil, making the point that on a global scale ruritanian rules apply, and voskuils counter boiled down to selgin not understanding his own works, and so I tagged selgin, who came in like this…) https://twitter.com/GeorgeSelgin/status/1493744613646954497

In regard to inflation and Nash’s ICPI. Nash was looking to create a constitutional basis for inflation targeting for central banked currencies. …

Spoke “row” as in “row your boat” A mode denoted with a : Its a hidden re-solution that causes a dissolution (ie the opposite of re-solution)

Here I’m thinking of the suggestion of a type of observation, such as stars or vertices, and traversing them as an equilibrium of favorable, or not favorable, allies. For our example we want to considering driving through a tunnel of many bouncing balls some of which are +ev, and some…

https://rextar4444.medium.com/a-p2p-mental-poker-nostr-implementation-possibility-972d4981bad8 It’s a paradigm shift to ask whether or not a mental poker implementation with relays actually relies on, or uses, nostr or runs as if it is a fork of nostr. So we are learning that when you lay a proper constitutional framework, the propriety of human nature/action fuels the natural evolution of the system described.

As an initial test I had the language model give back to me smith’s theory of moral sentiments but in JavaScript form. Here is an example: It’s not well understood today but this will be the basis or ‘heart’ for AI in regard to answering questions of a moral nature. It won’t itself have morality, but it will be able to give you the Nash Equilibrium response to social choices based on smith’s framework. This is different to how people think we should and should want to control AI. Its also different to how people think we should make and or weigh such decisions.