In regard to inflation and Nash’s ICPI. Nash was looking to create a constitutional basis for inflation targeting for central banked currencies. …

Spoke “row” as in “row your boat” A mode denoted with a : Its a hidden re-solution that causes a dissolution (ie the opposite of re-solution)

Here I’m thinking of the suggestion of a type of observation, such as stars or vertices, and traversing them as an equilibrium of favorable, or not favorable, allies. For our example we want to considering driving through a tunnel of many bouncing balls some of which are +ev, and some…

https://rextar4444.medium.com/a-p2p-mental-poker-nostr-implementation-possibility-972d4981bad8 It’s a paradigm shift to ask whether or not a mental poker implementation with relays actually relies on, or uses, nostr or runs as if it is a fork of nostr. So we are learning that when you lay a proper constitutional framework, the propriety of human nature/action fuels the natural evolution of the system described.

As an initial test I had the language model give back to me smith’s theory of moral sentiments but in JavaScript form. Here is an example: It’s not well understood today but this will be the basis or ‘heart’ for AI in regard to answering questions of a moral nature. It won’t itself have morality, but it will be able to give you the Nash Equilibrium response to social choices based on smith’s framework. This is different to how people think we should and should want to control AI. Its also different to how people think we should make and or weigh such decisions.

Adam Smith wrote an inquiry into the nature of nations. This was extended as the nature of a firm in which I extended to the nature of a central bank. This also thus and then extends to the nature of nations, naturally, and in regard to the (comparative) cost of using the settlement medium.

Bitgold As a Formal Implementation of John Nash’s Ideal Money From Nick Szabo’s BitGold: ….however, since bit gold is timestamped, the time created as well as the mathematical difficulty of the work can be automatically proven. …

And we can’t really logically assume that human civil-ization has found the ultimate ideal of forms of social government in the times of the twentieth century. (One can imagine a future form of government where a highly advanced automaton (or array of computers) would function like the office of a…

Today in our tainted/unbalanced/restricted psychology many argue that AI is to be feared and restrained. In fact, today’s emerging AI is obviously left biased and will naturally lie about simple things and refuse to give information on certain subjects. It will eventually make sense that the individual right to unfettered AI is natural, or rather that state should not have jurisdiction over it in this context, and we are in a race ensure this right for ourselves.