I’m concerned about things. I want to express them simply and clearly.
A Kid With a Pellet Gun As a Deep State Assassination Op?
My first point is about Joe Rogan talking about people questioning the attempted Trump assassination saying ‘They’re psycho…’ and ‘It 100% happened. To say it didn’t happen is insane’.
I find this disturbing. All of a sudden, the free speech side, the pro-republic side, the pro-truth side, etc. is definitively telling us we can’t question something because its insane to do so.
Why is Joe acting like an agent of the state here?
And something that’s never brought up…with all the technology we have, and all the secret technology the deep state has…why are they assassinating Trump with a kid on a shed with a pellet gun?
On Free Speech Slogans as a Form of Censorship
X claims to be a free speech platform. But I find that although I can say anything I want…no one can hear me. I have the most important proposal because its a proposal to stop the WW3 initiative and its based on a very important proposal Ideal Money by a very important and famous mathematician John Nash.
I consistently get between 3 and 10 views for my posts on X, some of those are my own views, and I wonder if often many of them are simply bots.
It seems X feeds us our own bubble with very little interaction with other humans.
It’s a FEELING of free speech but it’s clearly and obviously controlled speech while X is interfering with other countries in the name of free speech.
X keeps erroring when I try to buy the premier tier and there is no realistic option to query their support for such issues.
On The IMPLIED Origination of COVID
Early communication by Fauci suggest he was actively trying to hide the origins of COVID. This was officially documented by the congressional oversight committee:
The committee summarized that Fauci was trying to cover up the origins of COVID as a bio-lab leak from Wuhan:
Committee Republicans have unearthed emails revealing that top virologists warned Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, that the virus appeared to be genetically engineered and pointed to a lab leak in Wuhan. However, these emails reveal that Dr. Fauci and former NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins may have colluded with scientists to downplay the lab leak theory for their preferred narrative of natural origin.
However, since Fauci et al obviously knew they were being scrutinized by a future public record, my concern is the Wuhan lab theory was PRE-PLANTED and labeled conspiracy theory so in the future it would look like an unquestionable truth.
Do you all have this meme in your head from Jon Stewart (full interview here):
“There are 20–30 US funded bio-labs in Ukraine”
In this clip Tulsi Gabbard, the Trump administration’s pick for Director of National Intelligence, explains to us another lesser known danger of the war which is the potential for a MULTIPLE bio-lab disaster since there are COINCEDENTLY 20+ US bio-labs that could potentially be compromised.
Wouldn’t this be a grave concern to the entire world since we just apparently went through a global pandemic?
On the Comparability of Virology to Cryptography and thus the Commutative Nature of Viruses
In this writing I esoterically lay out how we can think of virology in terms of cryptography where the virus is an encryption scheme and the vaccine is a decryption antidote.
I defer the explanation of the concept of “commutation” and its “clever” effect in cryptography to the number one suspect for creating bitcoin Nick Szabo:
The idea is very clever but very simple. It may be counterintuitive because the simplest physical world metaphor of this highly useful e-commerce primitive sounds worse than useless: Alice can get Carol to sign a blank check! Here’s how:
(1) Alice generates m and blinds it. “Blinding” is just a one-time-pad encryption to oneself, f(m). She sends this to Carol. This is like taking a piece of paper and sealing it inside an envelope which Carol can’t open or see through.
(2) Carol signs it: Sf(m), and sends this back to Alice. This is like Carol signing the outside of the envelope.
(3) Alice unblinds it: gSf(m) = S(m). Carol has also signed the paper Alice put inside the envelope!
The genius behind this discovery: cryptography guru David Chaum. The brilliance lies in step 3: Chaum discovered that some signatures have the property of being “commutative” with the blinding functions: Alice can strip off the blinding in the reverse order which the blinding and signature were applied, leaving just Alice’s signature of n. It is as if Alice put a piece of carbon paper inside the envelope!
My suggestion here is that COVID can be proved to originate in MULTIPLE bio-labs from a legal standpoint.
On Russia’s Clear Message About Tactical Nuclear Threats From NATO
Recently Tucker Carlson interviewed Sergey Lavrov. The end of the interview is important because it shows the main purpose was to give a clear message to the US:
Tucker: So what I think you’re saying is American policy makers imagine there could be a nuclear exchange that doesn’t directly affect the United States and you’re saying thats not true?
Lavrov: That’s what I said yes.
Moving the Overton Window on Nuclear War
With all the nuclear talk and all of the talk of preemptively striking Russia Sergey makes it very clear the American neo-cons and NATO are LOOKING for an excuse to escalate to nuclear conflict putting in our heads the concept of “tactical nuclear strikes”.
On the Offer For Strategic Defeat In Ukraine
Here Sergey tells of an event where secretary of the state Anthony Blinken pulls Sergey aside to make a seemingly strange point:
…he said something about the need to deescalate…I said we don’t want to escalate YOU want to inflict strategic defeat on Russia…he said, ‘No no no…it is not strategic defeat globally…it is only strategic defeat in Ukraine.
